| > Find out what classes most helped these firm
leaders run their business. From technical to business,
students take a range of classes in college or graduate school. Each
class helps prepare students for their chosen profession. However,
some classes better prepare firm leaders for the daily and long-term
requirements and challenges associated with managing an
organization. Find out what firm leaders said when The Zweig Letter
asked, “What college or MBA courses helped the most for your future
career?”
Tom VanDorpe, president of VanDorpe Chou Associates (VCA)
(Orange, CA), a 50-person structural engineering consulting services
firm:
“One of my favorite classes was engineering economy, which was a
finance class. It included topics like financial formulas and
present value. It provided the background for financial literature.”
Karl Stumpf, vice president of RTKL Associates, Inc.
(Baltimore, MD), a 1,050-person A/E firm:
“Architecture history classes in graduate school were the most
helpful. One of the things about architectural school is that it’s a
general field but what you don’t get in school is a general sense of
architectural history. The class provided a broader perception of
design and why things are done in a certain way over time.”
Peter Terry, president of Benchmark Civil
Engineering Services (Allentown, PA), an 11-person civil,
transportation, and surveying firm:
“Of course, having a strong technical foundation in civil
engineering was most important. My English classes were also a huge
benefit. Being able to write letters and reports put me ahead of
many of my colleagues. I also took some easy accounting and
marketing classes which have helped me in starting and running
Benchmark.”
Paul VanDuyne, president of KJWW Engineering Consultants (Rock
Island, IL), a 400-person structural, mechanical, plumbing, and
technology firm:
“I’d have to say management supervision. It focused on how to
evaluate staff and how to motivate staff. Professionals typically
want to succeed if you provide them with the proper direction.
“One of the things we do at KJWW is we get our employees
additional education. We hired a corporate education manager. We’ve
cherry-picked 10 of the best courses from a local university and we
now offer them to employees. The courses are taught by a professor
who comes to the office. The classes include business negotiation,
goal setting, finance and budgeting, and management supervision.”
Louis Vergne, president of LAVA Architecture (Phoenix, AZ), a
4-person architectural firm:
“Technical design. General design. They are more directly related
to starting out in the professional world as opposed to theoretical
design courses. There should be business courses included, but
aren’t.”
Mark von Bradsky, principal with Structure Studio, a division
of 60-person consulting structural engineering firm NK Architects
(Morristown, NJ):
“Structural Analysis I: This course set the bar for engineering
thought and standard operating procedure processes that have guided
me for the last 28 years. It drew on all of the math, science, and
mechanics training we had in our early years of college and pulled
it all together. Technically, it formed a very strong basis of
structural engineering theory and forced us to visualize how a
structure reacts to various external forces. The professor was an
‘old timer,’ who stressed a standard operating procedure that had to
be utilized on every problem. This process has been beneficial
throughout my career in helping me define the problem, determine
what is known and what needs to be determined and finally, laying
out a clear path to the answer. This process can be used on any type
of question, be it a technical engineering problem to an
administrative issue in the office.”— FRANCEEN SHAUGHNESSY (fshaughnessy@zweigwhite.com)
Copyright © 2007, ZweigWhite. All rights reserved.
|